CASE PREVIEW · Michigan Court of Appeals

LaMie v Probst

Quiet-title suit as impermissible collateral attack on district court possession judgment

Decided

The citation

LaMie v Probst, unpublished per curiam opinion of the Court of Appeals, issued October 9, 2026 (Docket No. 376446), pp 1-2, 4-5

From the case summary

After Scott Probst failed to redeem property Comerica Bank bought at a foreclosure sheriff's sale, Comerica sued Probst and any occupants for possession in the 60th District Court; Ervin Joseph LaMie admitted being an occupant. LaMie then recorded a commercial lien based on an alleged…

Read the full Keypoint summary for the facts, ruling and practitioner takeaway.

Read the court’s original decision.